« Ads Subtract | Main | Mixed Messages »

January 22, 2004

Plutocratic Camouflage

It's interesting to watch how conservatives control the national political conversation. They depend on the general truth that conservatives have popular support on morality issues, like homosexuality and drugs, while liberals stand with the populace on the political issues, like wages, health care, and taxes. Whenever political issues start becoming, well, the issue, they throw out "gay marriage" or "sex education" and the real discourse disappears. Problem solved.

Unfortunately, the emotion involved in many questions of morality overshadows the rational discussion on more political issues. This serves their purposes well, because the plutocracy of the right is camouflaged by their smokescreen of hypocitical indignation at the "immoral" behavior of their focus. Many citizens, fixated on the bedrooms and doctor's offices of others, ignore their own financial and educational best interests when they vote based solely on morality issues. It seems, for them, to be okay for Bush to give the rich a huge tax break at our children's expense and send the sons and daughters of the middle- and lower-class to die for lies and oil as long as he keep the gays from getting uppity, right?

Posted by tat at January 22, 2004 10:38 AM
Comments

It's interesting and frustrating to watch politics. It's mostly about money and creating a perceived need.

Democrat: You need me. The Republicans want to starve children, poison the planet and make you slaves to big business. I can stop them.

Republican: You need me. The Democrats want to take your guns, tax all your income and make you wards of the state. I can stop them.

The truth is, leaders of both parties rely on labels and scare tactics to motivate. Plutocracy knows no party boundries. Wealthy individuals and entities control.

IMO voting often means choosing the lesser of two evils.

Posted by: Trickhorn at January 22, 2004 06:01 PM

Wouldn't it be great, if the vote you cast wasn't just for the lesser of the two evils?

Gene Roddenberry, help us!

Posted by: ToddDrevers at January 23, 2004 02:42 PM